Innovations in Tourism Policy: the Case of Poland

Marek W. Kozak


Competitiveness depends to a large extent on innovation. This is true about tourism also. This article focuses on the differences in innovations implemented in the field of tourism policy. The main aim of this article is to evaluate the differences in innovations in tourism policy. The key hypothesis suggests that in the countries undergoing the process of transformation, introduction of innovations is difficult and depends to a large extent on the capability to adopt the new post-industrial tourism paradigm. Poland serves here only as an exemplification of this phenomenon. An additional hypothesis suggests that public policy employs in practice more often “goal substitution” (instead of complex and demanding goals; for instance modernization or renovation instead of urban regeneration or culture or tourism), whereas the business sector is more product-oriented (in line with the new post-industrial paradigm). The article analyses public 2007-2013 strategies (and, to some extent, projects for 2014-2020), but first of all it compares the implementation of the strategy within the operational programs and in private sector activities. Finally, referring to Poland as part of the European Union, the paper proposes that new EU regulations may bring a change in non-product approach to tourism development policy.


Poland; Innovations; Regional Tourism Development; Knowledge based economy;

Full Text:

PDF (English)


Abernathy, W., & Clark, K., (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22.

Anders Group, (2015). O grupie. Retrieved Sept. 15, 2015 from

Cantner, U., Conti, E., & Meder, A. (2010). Networks and Innovation: The role of social assets in explaining firms’ innovative capacity. European Planning Studies, 18(12), 1937-1956.

D’Agostino, G., & Scarlato M., (2015). Innovation, Socio-Institutional Conditions and Economic Growth in the Italian Regions. Regional Studies, 49(9), 1514-1534.

Dolina Pałaców i Ogrodów Kotliny Jeleniogórskiej, (2015). Retrieved Sept. 15, 2015 from (English version).

EC (European Commission), (2015). Poland. Retrieved from

EC (European Commission), (2014). Investment for Jobs and Growth. 6th economic, social and territorial report on cohesion. Retrieved from

Goldenberg, J.D.R., & Mazursky, D., (2001). The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Science, 47(1), 69-84.

Gorzelak G. (2007). Rozwój-region-polityka. In: G. Gorzelak, & A. Tucholska (Eds), Rozwój-region-przestrzeń (pp. 179-214). Warszawa: MRR i EUROREG.

Grosse, T.G., (2004). Polityka regionalna Unii Europejskiej. Przykład Grecji, Włoch, Irlandii I Polski (Regional policy of the European Union. Example of Greece, Italy, Ireland and Poland). Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.

GUS (CSO), (1992). Rocznik statystyczny województw 1992. Warszawa: GUS.

GUS (CSO), (2013). Statistical yearbook of the regions – Poland. Warszawa: GUS.

GUS (CSO), (2014). Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach czasowej emigracji z Polski w latach 2004-2013. Warszawa: GUS.

Hjalager, A.-M. (2000). Innovation. In J. Jafari (Ed.), Encyclopedia of tourism. London: Routledge.

Hjalager, A.-M. (2002). Repairing innovation defectiveness in tourism. Tourism Management, 23(5), 465-474.

Hjalager, A.-M. (2010). A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, 31(1), 1-12.

Kozak, M.W. (2014). 10 lat polityki spójności w Polsce. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, (58)4, 25-50, doi: 10.7366/1509-4995-15802.

Kozak, M.W. (2015). Dewastacja wiejskich rezydencji w Polsce – czynniki. In M. Durydiwka, & K. Duda-Gracz (Eds), Przestrzeń w turystyce. Znaczenie i wykorzystanie (p.115-128). Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Geografii i Studiów Regionalnych.

Kozak, M.W. (2016). Zintegrowane Inwestycje Terytorialne jako eksperyment?. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, (65)4, 50-69, doi: 10.7366/1509499536501.

Kupiec T., & Wojtowicz D. (2013). Complementarity between programmes and projects within the regional Policy. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, (54)4, 44-63, doi: 7366/1509499545403.

Merton, D.R., (1968). Succession of goals. In D.L. Sills (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences, vol. 11, New York (NY): MacMillan Co & The Free Press.

MIR (Ministry of Infrastructure and Development), (2015). Mapa dotacji .Retrieved from

MIR (Ministry of Infrastructure and Development), (2014). Zbiór aktów prawnych Unii Europejskiej w zakresie Europejskich funduszy strukturalnych I inwestycyjnych na lata 2014-2020 (Regulations of the European Union published on 20.12.20 in EU Official Journal). Warszawa: MIR.

MSiT (Ministry of Sport and Tourism), (2008). Kierunki rozwoju turystyki. Warszawa: MSiT. Retrieved from,Kierunki-rozwoju-turystyki-do-2015-roku.html.

MSiT (Ministry of Sport and Tourism), (2015). Tourism development programme until 2020, Warszawa: MSiT.

Nordin, S. (2003). Tourism Clustering and Innovation – Paths to Economic Growth, Ostersund: ETOUR, Mid-Sweden University.

OECD (1996). The knowledge based economy. Retrieved from OECD, Paris

OECD, (2006). Innovation and Growth in Tourism, Paris: OECD.

PA (Umowa Partnerstwa), (2014). Retrieved from

Pechlaner, H., Fischer, E., & Hammann, E.-M. (2005). Leadership and innovation processes: Development of products and services based on core competencies. In M. Peters, & B. Pikkemaat (Eds), Innovation in Hospitality and Tourism (pp. 31-58). Princeton (NJ): The Havorth Hospitality Press.

Schumpeter J. (1952). Can Capitalism Survive?. New York (NY): Harper and Row.

UNWTO (United Nations World Tourism Organization), (2015). Tourism Highlights, 2015 edition, Madrid. Retrieved from

Wall, G., & Mathieson, A., (2006). Tourism. Change, impacts and opportunities. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.

DOI: 10.6092/issn.2036-5195/6761


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Marek W. Kozak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.