Battlefield Tourism at Gallipoli: The Revival of Collective Memory, the Construction of National Identity and the Making of a Long-distance Tourism Network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-5195/6382Keywords:
Gallipoli, Nation building, National identity, Battlefield tourism, AnzacAbstract
The Battle of the Dardanelles (Çanakkale), also known as the Gallipoli Campaign, played a crucial role in the construction and endorsement of national identity, irrespective of the immediate consequences such as the prolongation of the war or the resignation of Winston Churchill upon failure. The Battle of the Dardanelles is commemorated every year in Turkey, Australia and New Zealand, as a day of remembrance. The battlefields at Dardanelles were reinstated as the Gallipoli Peninsula Historical National Park in 1973. The park covers numerous cemeteries of soldiers from both sides, memorials, museums and the battlefields in an area of 33,000 hectares. The park provides a vivid setting and depiction of the war experience, and stands out as the most important battlefield site in Turkey.
The aim of this paper is to analyze battlefield tourism in Çanakkale in terms of its components and its impact on domestic and international tourism in Turkey. Battlefield tourism in Çanakkale encompasses not only the battlefield itself, but also the Çanakkale Victory Day in Turkey, March 18th, and the Anzac Day in Australia, April 25th. While domestic tourism contributes to the revival of collective memory and to the building of national identity, international tourism provides representations of national heritage as a source of political legitimacy. Unique to this case, battlefield tourism plays a significant role in the construction of a long-distance tourism network between Australia, and Turkey. The annual flow of descendants of ANZAC (Australian and New Zealand Army Corps) soldiers is an important source of tourism activity in the area.
References
Anzac Spirit, (n.d.). Retrieved from, https://www.awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/anzac/spirit/
Aydın, S. (2007). Çanakkale Savaşları, In: Başkaya,F. and Ersoy, T. (eds.) Resmi İdeoloji Sözlüğü [Dictionary of Official Ideology], pp. 63-81.
Bean’s Anzac Book shaped how Australians think about Gallipoli (2015). Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/beans-anzac-book-shaped-how-australians-think-about-gallipoli-38203
Bean, C.E.W., (1948). Gallipoli Mission, Australian War Memorial, Canberra. Retrieved from https://www.awm.gov.au/images/collection/pdf/RCDIG1069740--1-.pdf.
Bates, S. (2013). The Anzac Day Legend: Its Origins, Meaning, Power and Impact on Shaping Australia’s Identity, Sydney, unpublished Master’s of Peace and Conflict Studies Dissertation, Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Sydney.
Blom, T. (2000). Morbid Tourism - A postmodern market niche with an example from Althorp. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 54(1), 29-36.
Bongiorno, F. (2008). Whose War Was It Anyway? Some Australian Historians and the Great War. History Compass, 6(1), 62-90.
Bozkurt, A. (2012). Gelibolu Yarımadası’nda İtilaf Blokuna Ait Harp Mezarlıklarının İnşası ve Statüsü [The Status of Graves, Cemeteries and Monuments of the Entente Bloc], Atatürk Merkezi Araştırma Dergisi, 8(84), 57-101.
Bozkurt, C. (2015). Çanakkale Şehitleri Abidesi’nin İnşaatı ve Türk Kamuoyundaki Yankıları [The Construction of the Çanakkale Martyrs’ Memorial and Its Reflection in Turkish Society], Turkish Studies, 10(5), 79-94.
Butler, R. and Suntikul, W. (eds.) (2013). Tourism and War. London: Routledge, 2013.
Commemorating the Centenary of Anzac (n. d.). Retrieved from http://www.budget.gov.au/2012-13/content/overview/html/overview_32.htm
Chronis, A. (2005). Coconstructing Heritage at the Gettysburg Storyscape. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(2), 386–406.
Çanakkale Savaşları Gelibolu Tarihi Alan Başkanlığı, 2015 Faaliyet Raporu [Annual Report of the Directorate of Çanakkale Wars Gallipoli Historical Region] (2015). Retrieved from http://catab.kulturturizm.gov.tr/TR,159996/faaliyet-raporlari.html
Erickson, E.J. (2001). Strength against Weakness: Ottoman Military Effectiveness at Gallipoli, 1915. The Journal of Military History, 65, 981-1012.
Final report of the Dardanelles Commission, part II, conduct of operations &.c. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://www.nla.gov.au/apps/cdview/?pi=nla.aus-vn2035864-s8-e and http://www.nla.gov.au/apps/cdview/?pi=nla.aus-vn2035864-s9-e
Fathi, R. (2016). Is Australia Spending Too Much on the “Anzac Centenary”? A Comparison with France, Honest History, 14 April 2016 (retrieved from http://honesthistory.net.au/wp/fathi-romain-is-australia-spending-too-much-on-the-anzac-centenary-plus-hh-background-on-spending-politics/)
Foley, M. and Lennon, J.J. (1996). JFK and Dark Tourism: A fascination with assassination. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2(4), 198–211.
Gallipoli Peninsula Historical National Park Simulation and Information Center for the Legend of Gallipoli (2012). Retrieved from http://www.milliparklar.gov.tr/kitap/55/55.pdf.
Gammage, B. (2005). The Graves of Anzac, in Gallipoli in Retrospect: 90 Years On, in Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Atatürk and Gallipoli Campaign Research Center, Çanakkale, 59-69.
Grief Tourism Definition, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.grief-tourism.com/grief-tourism-definition/ on May 9, 2016.
Hall, C.M. (2002). ANZAC Day and secular pilgrimage, Tourism Recreation Research, 27(2), 83-87.
Inglis, Ken (2008). Sacred Places: War Memorials in the Australian Landscape. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Jansen-Verbeke, M. and George, W. (2015). Memoryscapes of the Great War (1914-1918): A paradigm shift in tourism research on war heritage. Via@, 2015-2(8).
Kirişçi, C.A (2014). The representation of Gallipoli in Turkish literature: A brief overview, In: İlhan, M.M. (eds.) Gallipoli: History, Memory and National Imagination, Ankara Türk Tarih Kurumu, pp. 183-201.
Kirişçi, C.A. (2015). The face of the ‘enemy’: The image of the adversary in Turkish literary works about Gallipoli. Journal of New Zealand Literature, 33(2), 160-181.
MacCannell D. (1976). The tourist: A new theory of the leisure class. Schocken Books: New York.
Macfie, A.L. (1983). The straits question in the First World War, 1914-18. Middle Eastern Studies, 19(1), 43-74.
McKernan, M. (2010). Gallipoli, A Short History, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
Miles, S.T. (2012). Battlefield tourism: meanings and interpretations. Unpublished PhD thesis. Retrieved at http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3547/ on May 9, 2016.
Miles, S.T. (2014). Battlefield Sites as Dark Tourism Attractions: An Analysis of Experience. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 9(2), 134-147.
O’Neill, S. (2002). ‘Soham pleads with trippers to stay away’, Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1405391/Soham-pleads-with-trippers-to-stay-away.html on May 9, 2016.
Rojek, C. (1997). Indexing, dragging and the social construction of tourist sights. In: Rojek, C. and Urry, J. (eds.) Touring Cultures: Transformations of Travel and Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 52–74.
Ryan, C. (ed.) (2007). Battlefield Tourism: History, Place and Interpretation; Oxford: Elsevier.
Seal, G. (2004). Inventing Anzac: The Digger National Mythology. Santa Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Scates, B. (2002). In Gallipoli’s shadow: Pilgrimage, memory, mourning and the Great War. Australian Historical Studies, 33(119), 1-21.
Scates, B. (2006). Return to Gallipoli: Walking the Battlefields of the Great War, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Seaton, A.V. (1999). War and thanatourism: Waterloo 1815-1914. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(1), 130-158.
Sınmaz Sönmez, C. (2015). Çanakkale Savaşları’nı Anma ve Kutlama Etkinlikleri (1916-1938) (Commemoration and Celebration Events of the Gallipoli Campaign (1916-1938) Çanakkale Araştırmaları Türk Yıllığı, 13(19), 173-195.
Slade, P. (2003). Gallipoli Thanatourism: The Meaning of ANZAC. Annals of Tourism Research. 30(4), 779-794.
Smith, M.S. (2010). The Relationship Between Australians and the Overseas Graves of the First World War, unpublished master’s (MA) thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Humanities Program, Queensland.
Smith, V.L. (1989) Hosts and Guests: Anthropology of Tourism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Smith, V.L. (1998). War and tourism: An American Ethnography. Annals of Tourism Research. 25(1), 202-227.
Stone, P. and Sharpley, R. (2008). Consuming dark tourism: A thanatological perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 35 (2), 574-595.
Türk Ansiklopedisi (Turkish Encyclopedia) (1963), v. IX, Milli Eğitim Basımevi, Ankara.
Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi, Çanakkale Savaşları Gelibolu Tarihi Alan Başkanlığı Kurulması Hakkında Kanun Tasarısı ve Milli Eğitim, Kültür, Gençlik ve Spor Komisyonu Raporu (Turkish Grand National Assembly, Report of the National Education, Culture, Youth and Sports Commission on the draft bill for the establishment of a Directorate of Çanakkale Wars Gallipoli Historical Region), Sıra No: 601(1/927). Retrieved from https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem24/yil01/ss601.pdf.
Understanding Anzac Day, Past, Present and Future, http://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-attachments/Gallipoli_Anzacs_Unit7_0.pdf
Urry, J. (1990). The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage Publications.
War Correspondent Charles Bean – Biography (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.gallipoli.gov.au/battle-of-the-landing/charles-bean/biography-cew-bean-1879-1968.php
Winter, C. (2011a), Battlefield Visitor Motivations: Explorations in the Great War Town of Ieper, Belgium. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13, 164–176.
Winter, C. (2011b). Battlefield Tourism and Australian National Identity: Gallipoli and the Western Front. In: Fren, E. and White, L. (eds.) Tourism and National Identities: An International Perspective, Oxon and New York: Routledge. pp. 176-189.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Elif Yeneroglu Kutbay, Aslihan Aykac
Copyrights and publishing rights of all the texts on this journal belong to the respective authors without restrictions.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (full legal code).
See also our Open Access Policy.
Metadata
All the metadata of the published material is released in the public domain and may be used by anyone free of charge. This includes references.
Metadata — including references — may be re-used in any medium without prior permission for both not-for-profit and for-profit purposes. We kindly ask users to provide a link to the original metadata record.
