ATRIUM: Heritage, Intercultural Dialogue and the European Cultural Routes


  • John Patrick Leech University of Bologna



ATRIUM, Dissonance, Heritage, Dialogue, Routes


One of the key priorities of the Cultural Routes programme of the Council of Europe is intercultural dialogue. The resolution of the Council of Ministers no. 67 (2013) indicated that an overriding strategic goal of the Council was to “promote dialogue and understanding between majority and minority, native and immigrant cultures.” It linked this general principle to two other documents regarding strategic policy for the Council of Europe: the White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue entitled “Living Together As Equals in Dignity” (White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue, 2008) and the Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, otherwise known as the “Faro Convention”  (Council of Europe Framework Convention, 2005). These general principles were adopted by the Council of Europe Advisory Forum of the Cultural Routes in Baku in 2014, whose closing declaration included an exhortation that the cultural routes should act asvectors of intercultural dialogue” (Baku Declaration (2014). This paper will look at the way the ATRIUM cultural route has attempted to interpret and implement this strategic goal.


Baku Declaration (2014). Retreived from

Battilani, P., Bernini C. and Alessia Mariotti (2018). How to cope with dissonant heritage: a way towards sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2018.1458856.

Bodenschatz, H., P. Sassi & M. Welch Guerra, eds. (2015). Urbanism and dictatorship. A European perspective. Berlin and Basel: Birkhäuser.

Council of Europe Framework Convention (2005). Retreived from

European Charter of the Architectural Heritage (1975). Retreived from

Fulbrook, M. (2005). The People’s State. East German society from Hitler to Honecker. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dimitrovgra (n.d.). I am and I will be. Dimitrovgrad: Dimitrovgrad City Council.

Gentile, E. (2008). Modernità totalitaria. Il fascismo italiano. Bari: Laterza.

Leech, J.P. (2014). ATRIUM. From European project to European cultural Route. Future perspectives for development. In C. Castellucci, V. San Vicente Capanaga and C. Vallicelli (Eds.), L’architettura, i regimi totalitari e la memoria del ‘900 (pp. 150-154). Forlì: Casa Walden.

Leech, J.P. (2018). The anxieties of dissonant heritage: ATRIUM and the architectural legacy of regimes in local and European perspective. In H. Hokerberg (Ed.), Architecture as propaganda in twentieth-century totalitarian regimes (pp. 245-260). Firenze: Polistampa.

Mariotti, A., P. Battlilani and C. Bernini (2015). Un heritage controverso come prodotto turistico: L’Architettura del periodo fascista a Forlì. In R. Garibaldi (Ed.), Il turismo culturale europeo. Città ri-visitate. Nuove idee e forme del turismo culturale (pp. 88-100). Milan: Franco Angeli.

Prati, L. and U. Tramonti (Eds.), (1999). La città progettata: Forlì, Predappio, Castrocaro. Urbanistica e architettura fra le due guerre. Forlì: Comune di Forlì.

Tramonti, U. (2005). Le radici del razionalismo in Romagna. Forlì: Menabò.

Tramonti, U. (2017). Albania, una e mille. In U. Tramonti (Ed.), Architettura e urbanistica nelle terre d’oltremare. Dodecaneso, Etiopia, Albania (1924-1943) (pp. 83-92). Bologna: Bononia University Press.

Tunbridge, J.E. and G.J. Ashworth (1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Chichester: Wiley.

White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue (2008). Retrieved from




How to Cite

Leech, J. P. (2019). ATRIUM: Heritage, Intercultural Dialogue and the European Cultural Routes. Almatourism - Journal of Tourism, Culture and Territorial Development, 10(20), 37–45.